
Well here he goes again...another book on revisionist, progressive, emerging, a new kind of Christianity for a new kind of Christian who believes in a generous orthodoxy in an everything must change world. There I have my cynicism taken care of in relationship to Brian McLaren. See I deeply appreciate many of the questions Brian is raising, including those in this book. My problem is that I find myself having difficulty with Brian's answers and where he gets them. I was also deeply disappointed when he stepped down from being a pastor of a local church working out his theology in the day to day context of the Christian community called church. Yet, one cannot or should not ignore his thought as it continues to have significant influence with many people as the church navigates the massive societal and ecclesiastical changes that are taking place in the early 21st century. So what does McLaren offer us this time around?
McLaren begins by insisting that many have lost the sense of "quest" (journey or pilgrimage) in the Christian life which in turn neglects life's and faith's sense of "questioning"...kind of a postmodern version of the modernist philosopher Descartes "I question, therefore I am." By recalling a sense of quest and questioning, McLaren then poses the following questions (with his 'answers')...
BOOK ONE: UNLOCKING AND OPENING
Question One: The Narrative Question-What is the story of the Bible?
Question Two: The Authority Question-How should the Bible be understood? Revelation through conversation.
Question Three: The God Question-Is God violent? From a violent tribal God to a Christlike God
Question Four: The Jesus Question-Who is Jesus and why does he matter? Finding Jesus outside the lines
Question Five: The Gospel Question-What is the Gospel? Jesus and the Kingdom of God
BOOK TWO: EMERGING AND EXPLORING
Question Six: The Church Question-What do we do about the church?
Question Seven: The Sex Question-Addressing Human Sexuality without fighting about it
Question Eight: The Future Question-Finding a better way to view the Future
Question Nine: The Pluralism Question-Relating to Other People of Other Faiths
Question Ten: The What Do We Do Now Question-Translating Quest into Action
The subtext of the book is "What would Christianity look like if we weren't afraid of the questions?" I am increasingly concerned about "What would Christianity look like if we weren't afraid to discover the answers to the questions?" Again, if McLaren's book gets Christians and various Christian communities to ask and struggle with the questions raised in this book, I say "Fantastic!" However it will take great pastoral guidance from Holy Scripture as well as the faithful witness of the evangelical, ecumenical orthodox tradition of the Christian church to guide that quest and conversation. There is almost a "throwaway whatever" in McLaren's theology that is most disturbing. If post-modernism is to be taken seriously within evangelicalism, it is going to require its most public proponents (emergent/emerging church movement members) to move beyond the biblical, historical, philosophical and theological skepticism of our culture (which is as skeptical as modernism and Descartes' "I think therefore I am.") and return to a truly "generous orthodoxy" that humbly yet with conviction can affirm the evangelical, ecumenical orthodox expressions of Christian faith "without crossing your fingers behind your back". I therefore stand with John Stott when he answered the following question in his last interview with CHRISTIANITY TODAY in 2006" (http://www.christianitytoday.com/ct/2006/october/32.94.html)
CT Question: what is evangelicalism, and why does it matter?
John Stott Answer: An evangelical is a plain, ordinary Christian. We stand in the mainstream of historic, orthodox, biblical Christianity. So we can recite the Apostles Creed and the Nicene Creed without crossing our fingers. We believe in God the Father and in Jesus Christ and in the Holy Spirit.
Having said that, there are two particular things we like to emphasize: the concern for authority on the one hand and salvation on the other.
For evangelical people, our authority is the God who has spoken supremely in Jesus Christ. And that is equally true of redemption or salvation. God has acted in and through Jesus Christ for the salvation of sinners.
I think it's necessary for evangelicals to add that what God has said in Christ and in the biblical witness to Christ, and what God has done in and through Christ, are both, to use the Greek word, hapax—meaning once and for all. There is a finality about God's word in Christ, and there is a finality about God's work in Christ. To imagine that we could add a word to his word, or add a work to his work, is extremely derogatory to the unique glory of our Lord Jesus Christ.
THOUGHTS...